Patient warming significantly decreases the risk of surgical site infection. Recently there have been concerns that forced air warming may interfere with unidirectional airflow, potentially posing an increased risk of infection. Our null hypothesis was that forced air and radiant warming devices do not increase the temperature and the number of particles over the surgical site when compared with no warming device. A forced air warming device was compared with a radiant warming device and no warming device as a control. The temperature and number of particles were measured over the surgical site. The theatre was prepared as for a routine lower-limb arthroplasty operation, and the same volunteer was used throughout the study.
Forced air warming resulted in a significant mean increase in the temperature (1.1°C vs 0.4°C, p < 0.0001) and number of particles (1038.2 vs 274.8, p = 0.0087) over the surgical site when compared with radiant warming, which raises concern as bacteria are known to require particles for transport.
- Forced air warming
- Patient warming
- Unidirectional airflow
- Laminar airflow
- Patient Warming
- Radiant warming
No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.
- Received June 7, 2011.
- Accepted September 14, 2011.
- ©2012 British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery